I received a tweet this morning – “Telerehab+fall predict platform= Game changing. Effective?” (I tried to embed it but it wasn’t working). The American Telemedicine Association is having their meeting in Minneapolis this week, and it will include telehealth platforms for seniors. Two quick thoughts about the idea before I get ready for work (I’d love your comments and thoughts in the comments or on Twitter).
First, I agree with the author of the article that cost will be a huge issue. Those on a fixed income are not going to have much wiggle room, and those who are poorer and rely on SS definitely will not. This will be an increasing concern with the Baby Boomers given the data out there on their savings (or lack of) for retirement.
Second, will THEY want to wear it/ use it? There is a great section of dialog in Jurassic Park where the grandfather is defending all he has done to the scientists, that he spared no expense, and Ian (Jeff Goldblum’s character) says something to the effect of your scientists were so busy asking if they could they didn’t ask if they should. In the same vein, are we so busy asking if we can do all this great tech we aren’t asking whether they want it? Yes, there are those who love tech and will embrace the idea, but are those the ones that are having the falls, experiencing incontinence, not eating well, etc? It reminds me of the Fitbit – those who use it are often the ones who are already fit. Will they view it as an invasion of their privacy, of one extra step closer to an ALF or a nursing home, despite assurances that the tech is “to keep them as independent as possible for as long as possible”?
I think the technology has the potential to be effective, and to be a game changer for many. But I think that for many others the financial cost and the resistance against the tech intrusion will require continued personal monitoring and involvement by family and the home health community.
Photo credit: “Old and New” by Sparky